The Charlie Kirk assassination may end up being the most important event of our time.
According to the known evidence either Tyler Robinson assassinated Charlie Kirk with his grandfathers 30-06 from the Losse Center rooftop as the state of Utah has charged him with; or it's a multi-agency, multi-national, operation to execute an American citizen on American soil, in a public humiliation ritual.
And if a foreign government can do that to a public figure like Charlie Kirk, what's to stop them if they decide they don't like something you've said.
The closer you look at the Charlie Kirk assassination the more questions have to be asked.
Although there is no hard evidence as of yet that Israel and Netanyahu's government had anything to do with assassinating Charlie Kirk, there is plenty of evidentiary motive for them to do so.
Israel has been suspected of conducting operations on American soil before; like 9/11.
At the time of his assassination, Kirk was in a real political fight with the pro-Israel machine; that fight is documented.
On September 10, 2025, Charlie Kirk was assassinated at 12:23 p.m. MDT while speaking at Utah Valley University. It was the opening for Turning Point USA’s “American Comeback Tour.” About 3,000 people were present.
Authorities say a single shot came from the roof of the Losee Center, roughly 140 yards away, fired from a 30-06 by Tyler Robinson. Charlie Kirk was fatally wounded in the neck but there was no exit wound.
Kirk was pronounced dead about an hour later.
Robinson now stands trial for aggravated/first-degree murder and related counts.
Prosecutors seek the death penalty.
Almost immediately the public began to question the state's charge.
Anyone who knows anything about guns knows that no human neck could stop a round from a 30-06.
Charlie had a million dollar security company surrounding him, consisting of 12 former Spec Ops guys. Not one of them reacted how most people would think this caliber of security team would.
None of them ducked for cover. None of them drew their weapons. None of them acted like there was an additional threat.
So how does Israel get placed in all of this?
KIRK, TRUMP, WAR WITH IRAN
Kirk spent years as a Christian Zionist who said the land of Israel belonged to the Jewish people.
In 2025 he also became one of the few people in Trump’s orbit willing to say that a U.S. war with Iran on Israel’s timetable was a trap.
He said Iran had “the potential to be the worst Middle East quagmire of all time.” and pointed out that the same people calling for a war with Iran were “the same architects of the Iraq war.”
Steve Bannon later said Kirk was “adamantly opposed to a regime change war against Iran.”
Kirk personally appealed to Trump against committing U.S. forces.
After his death, TPUSA and the surviving Charlie Kirk Show apparatus ceased with the anti-war line and redoubled their efforts on the pro-Israel cause.
TPUSA DONORS
Working from 990s, TPUSA’s cumulative fundraising from 2012 through mid-2023 was about $389 million, much of which came from pro-Zionist organizations and individuals.
TPUSA’S largest previous year donors are: Wayne Duddlesten Foundation, $13.1 million. Deceased Texas real estate developer supporting many GOP causes.
Jack Roth Foundation: Jewish, Zionist Activist, $8.7 million.
Brad Parscale, Zionist Activist, ~$6–9M, registered as a foreign agent (FARA) for Israel’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs “to produce and place pro-Israel messaging”.
Home Depot’s Bernie Marcus $7.1 million, Jewish, Zionist Activist.
Isaac Perlmutter, Israeli-born Jew, Zionist Activist. $1.125 million, dual Israeli-American citizenship; served in the IDF.
The International Fellowship of Christians and Jews (IFCJ), an Israel-based group that fundraises off evangelicals and donates to Israeli officialdom.
IFCJ committed to $700,000 for campus “activism kits.”
Robert Shillman, Jewish, Zionist Activist, and major funder of right-wing Zionist organizations was described as one of Kirk’s most committed patrons.
A few days before the assassination, Shillman pulled a $2 million annual pledge from TPUSA because Kirk was not towing the line for Israel.
Kirk's text messages show he responded “Just lost another huge Jewish donor. $2 million a year because we won’t cancel Tucker.”
Zionist organizations were attempting to cancel Tucker because of his public questioning of Israeli involvement in 9/11.
Charlie refused to be blackmailed.
CHARLIE’S LETTER TO NETANYAHU
On May 2, 2025 Charlie penned a letter to Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
The published excerpts, which were not disputed by Netanyahu’s office, include the following:
Kirk wrote that anti-Israel and antisemitic trends were at “record levels on social media,” flowing onto campuses and “even seep[ing] into the conservative MAGA community.”
“Israel is losing the information war and needs a ‘communications intervention.’”
“Israel is getting CRUSHED on social media and you are losing younger generations of Americans, even among MAGA conservatives.”
“Sometimes, it feels like I’m defending Israel in public more than your own government”
he wrote to Netanyahu.
He listed the hostile questions he was fielding on tour, including:
“Why does Israel conduct ethnic cleansing?”
“Why is America subsidizing Israel’s genocide against the Palestinian people?”
“Israel and the Jews are running U.S. foreign policy.”
“Why is Israel trying to drag us into a war in the Middle East?”
Charlie’s unsolicited proposals to the prime minister included:
“Stop subcontracting Israel’s defense to American surrogates; build a Trump-style rapid-response team on X; stand up pro-Israel fact-checkers; create an “Israel Truth Network”; send released hostages on a U.S. speaking tour; run a “Dude, you got us wrong!” campaign interviewing Israelis of every background; explain the Iranian nuclear threat more convincingly to conservatives wary of another quagmire; cultivate younger first-person voices; scrap dim-podium IDF briefings and rebuild the comms operation”.
Some speculate that prime minister Netanyahu believed he had already paid Charlie Kirk hundreds of millions of dollars through his proxies to perform the exact services that he was now being lectured by Kirk to perform himself.
CHARLIES DISSOLUTION WITH ISRAELS ACTIONS IN GAZA
With Charlie’s warning about ethnic cleansing, complaints about donor blackmail, and an Iran war he did not want, he was becoming a problem for the Israeli, Jewish, and Zionist donor consensus.
In a leaked early-September WhatsApp, Kirk had texted that Jewish donors “play into all the stereotypes” and that he was being left “no choice but to leave the pro-Israel cause.”
THE HAMPTON INTERVENTION
Citing five people who said they had knowledge of the meeting, Grayzone reported that, in early August, just weeks before the assassination, Bill Ackman convened an “intervention” with Charlie Kirk in the Hamptons. Reportedly Netanyahu attended by phone.
Kirk was allegedly “hammered” for growing criticism of Israel and for platforming Israeli skeptics (especially Tucker Carlson at AmericaFest). Ackman allegedly demanded Carlson’s invitation be pulled.
One source said Kirk left feeling he had been subjected to “blackmail.”
Long time friend of Charlie Kirk, Candace Owens independently described the same event as an “Ackman-staged intervention” in which “threats were made” and offers to “take TPUSA to the next level” in exchange for compliance were also proposed.
The Hamptons intervention is not disputed. Ackman has since issued a statement denying that he threatened Kirk, Turning Point, or anyone around him, denying blackmail, and denying that he offered money to change Kirk’s views.
Patrick Bet-David, Iranian national and an immigrant to America, has since stated publicly that he was in attendance at Ackman's Hampton residence, and also had a phone conversation with Netanyahu in which an offer was made to him to become the next president of Iran after a regime change war.
CHARLIE SAYS HE'S AFRAID “THEY” WILL KILL HIM
On the eve of September 10, 2025, Kirk spent about two hours on Zoom with Rabbi Pesach Wolicki, a Jew who had advised Kirk since late 2023 on how to defend Israel on campus, Jewish Zionist Josh Hammer, Frank Turek, and “two Israeli officials”.
Allegations have been made that the attendees were attempting a second “get-right-with-Israel” intervention with Kirk.
Josh Hammer said Kirk just “blew off steam” and that Kirk was asking how to argue the Israel issue more effectively with Gen Z.
During the Zoom meeting, Kirk messaged two people “they are going to kill me”. Erika Kirk immediately denied Charlie sent any message like that and stated publicly “I know because I have his phone”.
In spite of Erika Kirk's statement, August 2026 TPUSA
released a copy of an alleged Signal chat thread that shows Kirk texted “the Left is going to kill me”.
Owens has said three separate sources told her that the day before the shooting Kirk said some version of “I think they’re going to kill me” / “they are going to kill me.”
She named Andrew Kolvet as the recipient of one message and security figure Dan Flood as recipient of the other.
The raw messages have not been released as court exhibits. It is unclear if the prosecution or the defense has access to them as Erika Kirk has stated that she has the phone.
FBI ON SITE IN 16 MINUTES
FBI Director Kash Patel said the first agents were on scene at 12:39 p.m.—16 minutes after the alleged shot—and that the Bureau flew in fixed-wing assets, Hostage Rescue Team personnel, and forensic specialists to the scene of the assassination immediately.
Patel publicly framed the FBI’s role as supporting Utah’s prosecution, not replacing it.
But inquisitors are wondering how the FBI could have arrived on site in 16 minutes when their nearest field office is more than an hour drive from UVU.
INTELLIGENCE AGENCY PROHIBITS INQUIRY
Joe Kent, a former Green Beret confirmed in July 2025 as director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), obtained access to FBI files on the Kirk case in the weeks after the assassination.
The New York Times reported that he was looking at
whether Robinson had support from another person, a foreign power, or another entity.
FBI Director Kash Patel believed Kent was overstepping and risking the prosecution.
The dispute went to a White House meeting that included Patel, Kent, DNI Tulsi Gabbard, senior Justice officials, Vice President JD Vance, and chief of staff Susie Wiles.
After resigning in March 2026 over opposition to the Iran war, Kent said on Tucker Carlson’s show and elsewhere that NCTC had “foreign leads” it was not allowed to pursue; that FBI officials told his team to stop looking into it because further investigation could make them witnesses for the defense; and that Patel personally made the call to cease the investigation.
Kent’s formulation was: Kirk had been “vocally advocating for us to not go to war with Iran and for us to rethink, at least, our relationship with the Israelis, and then he’s suddenly publicly assassinated and we’re not allowed to ask any questions about that,
it’s a data point.”
He said the foreign nexus was “not thoroughly looked into.”
Kent’s “data point” sequence:
Kirk resists Iran war
Kirk resists donor blackmail
Kirk is assasinated
NCTC is told to stop looking at a foreign nexus.
Later the U.S. is in a war with Iran
Kent blamed the “pressure from Israel and its powerful American lobby.”
Many following the story treat the 16-minute arrival by the FBI and later pushback against Joe Kent’s file review as proof of a broader conspiracy than a lone gun-man.
12 ISRAELI PHONES AT UVU
In November 2025 Owens said she could “beyond the shadow of a doubt confirm” that 12 personal cell accounts opened in Israel were physically on the UVU campus on September 10, that this was not VPN traffic, and that NSA, Kash Patel, and the White House knew and wanted it suppressed.
NETANYAHU'S DENIAL VIDEO
On September 18, 2025, just eight days after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, Israeli prime minister Netanyahu recorded a video aimed at an American audience calling the Israel-killed-Kirk story a “monstrous big lie” and compared it to Nazi propaganda.
Theorists treated the speed and tone of the denial as suspicious.
CAPTURE OF THE KIRK BRAND
Almost immediately after Charlie Kirk's death TPUSA appointed Erika Kirk, Charlie's “grieving” widow, as CEO and chairperson of the organization despite the fact she had no qualifications in either role.
What she does have is a checkered past with strange affiliations to Jewish Zionists and even six degrees of separation from Jeffrey Epstein, who was suspected of a vast blackmail operation on behalf of the Israeli Mossad.
Israel, or its American instruments, had means, motive, and opportunity to assassinate Charlie Kirk.
Tyler Robinson's roommate, Lance Twiggs, testified under oath that he had never heard Robinson discuss politics or mention Charlie Kirk's name. Twigs has been given immunity in the case.
A strong American-nationalist leader would not necessarily possess some special anti-assassination shield. But a nationalist leader would view, and would be held responsible for, an American citizen being assassinated in public as a national humiliation.
Under a strong nationalist government there would not be a pro-foreign-country lobby, nor any foreign networks operating within our borders.
A strong nationalist leader would have the ability to immediately expel them, imprison them, or worse.
He would tighten borders, monitor diasporas, punish host institutions that cooperate with foreign services, and answer an assassination with collective retaliation.
A political assassination on U.S. soil by any foreign actor is an act of war.
If it is ever proved that Israel or the American government had anything to do with the Charlie Kirk assassination, this event will force the American people into its final hour of decision.
Are we a people who will allow this kind of national humiliation, or do American men still have the will to administer vengeance?
Not long ago, a World War was ignited over foreign actors committing political assassination.
Maxx Prax
Sr Writer
American Fascist Imperium
X
@maddmaxxXIV
http://maxxprax.substack.com
Mad Maxx
XIV